Comments on: Why is it that every were i look it says smokeless tobacco is less harmful than cigarettes but also people?

By: Lanham

Lanham — Fri, 12 Dec 2008 01:12:04 +0000

I’ve always felt that smokeless tobacco was as dangerous to your health as cigarettes as far as cancer is concerned but with smokeless tobacco you don’t have to worry about shortening your breathe.

By: psrobi

psrobi — Tue, 09 Dec 2008 20:35:45 +0000

Oh my Gosh!!! you have to see this site, I found it when I was looking for information about a skin cancer my Dad had.
I don’t think people talk about it much, just because most of the time you don’t really know if someone is chewing or not. and no one else gets a whiff or has much to say about it.
Please look at this site though, If there is ANYTHING that will make someone think twice about chewing this will. This guy tells his story about getting oral cancer from chew. He’s doing a very good thing by putting it all out there for others to learn from.

By: dr moralez

dr moralez — Tue, 09 Dec 2008 07:30:39 +0000

ya like that one person. its not less harmfull just in diffrent ways. smokless screws up you gums and teeth all nasty like. and smoking fucks up your lungs and heart

By: leonardlawson79

leonardlawson79 — Sat, 06 Dec 2008 14:57:50 +0000

because you do not harm anyone using smokless tobacco and it also has less cancer causing carcinogens, but smoking everyone has o breath and is bad on everyones lungs and heart.

By: L

Thu, 04 Dec 2008 01:21:41 +0000

There is no second hand smoking.

By: Mrs.Sailor

Mrs.Sailor — Sun, 30 Nov 2008 19:27:36 +0000

Smokeless tobacco is NOT less harmful. It is harmful in other ways. It is still just as harmful and dangerous.